This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug rtl-optimization/25609] too agressive printf optimization
- From: "drepper at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 30 Dec 2005 23:06:20 -0000
- Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/25609] too agressive printf optimization
- References: <bug-25609-700@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #4 from drepper at redhat dot com 2005-12-30 23:06 -------
No, it's *NOT* undefined. The libc interface decides what is defined and what
is not and it is *EXPLICITLY* documented that NULL pointers are printed as
(null).
The standard might leave it undefined but this does *NOT* mean the
implementation cannot define it.
--
drepper at redhat dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|DUPLICATE |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25609