This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug testsuite/23304] [4.1 Regression] testsuite failures: g++.dg/ext/packed3.C, packed4.C, packed8.c and g++.dg/other/crash-4.C
- From: "hp at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 22 Oct 2005 06:56:58 -0000
- Subject: [Bug testsuite/23304] [4.1 Regression] testsuite failures: g++.dg/ext/packed3.C, packed4.C, packed8.c and g++.dg/other/crash-4.C
- References: <bug-23304-507@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-22 06:56 -------
I reconfirm this regression PR.
There seems to be a real bug lurking in packed4.C failing, exposed by Nathan's
"Undo DECL_PACKED when possible" change for PR 21166. Maybe I'm missing
something, but I doubt the FAIL should depend on the target ABI (default
packed).
The errors in the other tests now depending on the ABI seems wrong too.
Shouldn't the attribute reflect in the type and never be stripped, as
apparently
the "binding" depends on it?
Nathan?
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2005-08-10 00:28:29 |2005-10-22 06:56:58
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23304