This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/23691] [4.0 Regression] `mpl_::bool_<false>::value' is not a valid template argument for type `bool' because it is a non-constant expression


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-09-02 13:30 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Well, it is not 4.0.2, as 4.0.2 has not been released.  FSF version.c contains
> prerelease string which somewhat explains that it is really not yet official
> 4.0.2, but we use the version also for rpm version where claiming the compiler is
> 4.0.2 would be misleading.  It is something between 4.0.1 and 4.0.2.
> For any RH version.c, the date printed is the date of merge from the
> corresponding upstream gcc-X_Y-branch which is I guess the most important
> info for you.

Actually using 4.0.1 is more confusing to everyone or at least to me.  The point is using 4.0.2 is like 
everyone else does and for a reason.  It is based off of a FSF CVS after 4.0.1 was released and not on 
4.0.1 itself.  Seeing 4.0.1 I just tested a 4.0.2 (from about a week or so ago) which I had lying around.
Just change it to 4.0.2 like everyone else and then when anyone sees 4.0.2, they will go and test a 
recent 4.0.2 instead of a 4.0.2 which was a couple weeks old.

Anyways this is a discussion should really be internal to redhat since it was their fuck which made me 
make the mistake.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to work|4.0.0 4.1.0                 |4.0.0 4.1.0 4.0.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23691


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]