This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- To: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 15:11:36 -0400
- Subject: Re: [Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?
- References: <20010826094601.4131.k_satoda@f2.dion.ne.jp> <20050720190319.12135.qmail@sourceware.org>
On Jul 20, 2005, at 3:03 PM, schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
- given that 4.1's front end has already evolved from that in 2.95,
it's not clear that a conclusion based on 2.95 is even valid for
4.1.
(so should no likely assumed as being so).
It still is true since the front-end still does exactly what it did in
2.95 for
this testcase and there have been no changes in this area really.
Since the mainline is in stage3 which means no more improvements except
for fixing
bugs which are either regressions or non enhancement bugs.
-- Pinski