This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/22139] [4.0/4.1 regression] Segfault


------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-07-15 23:07 -------
While calling ggc_free may be a bad idea in general, it's certainly a good idea
in this case; empirically, that change resulted in a significantly faster
compiler, as the comment in the code indicates.  Furthermore, anything using
NEWDECL after we returned was broken anyhow; this is just showing us the problem.

Unfortunately, I'm not able to reproduce this problem on my machine.  Is there
any additional information about how we're using DECL_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATIONS?
 Or, information about your exact GC parameters to I can try to reproduce it
that way?

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22139


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]