This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tree-optimization/21839] [4.1 Regression] ICE for missing V_DEFS caused by salias with empty structures


------- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-05-31 17:32 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.1 Regression] ICE for missing
	V_DEFS caused by salias with empty structures

On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 17:25 +0000, nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-05-31 17:25 -------
> Are you sure my changes changed this behaviour? IIRC my changes removed the
> funky behaviour of ignoring the first field's offset. (well, that was the intent
> anyway)  I don't believe I changed the DECL_SIZE check bit.
> 
I looked, and it appears you are right.
Sorry bout that.
:)




-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21839


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]