This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/20178] COMPLEX function returns incompatible with g77
- From: "Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 22 May 2005 18:10:27 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/20178] COMPLEX function returns incompatible with g77
- References: <20050223185848.20178.stevenj@fftw.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de 2005-05-22 18:10 -------
Subject: Re: COMPLEX function returns incompatible with
g77
Tobias Schlüter wrote:
>>>------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10 22:23 -------
>>>Fixed on the mainline. I will commit this to the branch after the obligatory
>>>testing and the necessary changes (unfortunately -fsecond-underscore became the
>>>default on the branch).
>>
>>
>>[ Sorry for the late reply ]
>>
>>I wonder if that really means we have to stick to -fsecond-underscore on
>>the 4.0 branch. Only 4.0.0 is out, and it is very probable that
>>*nobody* uses it for any serious work in Fortran anyway.
>>
>>I feel we can safely change the default, even on the branch.
>
>
> I'm also inclined to doing this, 4.0.1 will probably be vastly more usable
> than 4.0, but I'd still like to get feedback from the list. It's really a
> minor incompatibility. Especially since a lot of people seem to use
> '-fno-second-underscore'.
I'll commit this during the week, unless somebody objects. Toon's approval
together with no objections so far is enough for me, but I wanted to give
everybody a last chance to object.
- Tobi
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20178