This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/21568] [4.0/4.1 regression] Casts in folding *& omitted
- From: "debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 21 May 2005 18:10:19 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/21568] [4.0/4.1 regression] Casts in folding *& omitted
- References: <20050514140942.21568.rguenth@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2005-05-21 18:10 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > This is undefined, see the full discussion on the gcc list:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-05/msg00073.html
>
> - out of curiosity, it's not clear that the discussion reached any
> conclusion which enables GCC to disreguard the type semantics
> as specifed by the program code. Where in the standard does it
> specify that a type qualifier may be disreguarded if convenient?
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-05/msg00085.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21568