This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/21203] Segfault while compiling libgfortran/intrinsics/selected_int_kind.f90


------- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-05-14 08:33 -------
(In reply to comment #16)
> Subject: Re:  Segfault while compiling
libgfortran/intrinsics/selected_int_kind.f90
> 
> 
> On May 14, 2005, at 3:00 AM, corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> 
> > * f95 disqualifies ifselves from several embedded targets, if it can 
> > not be
> > built/used on targets not supporting REAL8. IIRC, there even exist 
> > variants of
> > major _targets_ (IIRC, powerpc, m68k) which do not support REAL8.
> > IMO, this is a design flaw, which should be in your interest to be 
> > circumvented.
> 
> Huh, PPC soft float supports REAL 8 still.

Joel, do you recall the target in RTEMS which has 4-byte floats only?
(We recently had an issue with it floating point context sizes related to it?
IIRC, it had been a powerpc variant and we were forced to drop it because GCC
doesn't support it.

BTW1: IFAIK, there also exist sh-variants (target tuple *-single*) which don't
have 8byte floats. RTEMS doesn't support them, so I've never tried to build
fortran for then.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |joel at oarcorp dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21203


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]