This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary


------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com  2005-04-04 23:01 -------
Subject: Re: [Committed] PR c++/19199: Preserve COND_EXPR lvalueness in fold

Alexandre Oliva wrote:

> If you find that reviewing patch proposals is wasting your time, I'm
> sorry. 

Of course, untested patches should be clearly marked as such, which 
yours always are.  Given that, I don't feel like you're wasting my time 
with such a posting; if I see something obviously disconcerting I can 
comment.  However, I do find that I'm less interested in reviewing such 
patches.  So, from my point of view, I'd prefer that you post most 
patches after a full test cycle.



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19199


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]