This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug libfortran/19155] blanks not treated as zeros in 'E' format read (NIST FM110.FOR)


------- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-31 16:38 -------
Summary of what other compilers do: Portland, Sun and IBM accept it, while NEC
and MIPSpro reject it. My position would be: we go with the Standard.

Can we somehow have confirmation that Steve's interpretation is correct (not an
official interp, but maybe a well-advised opinion on comp.lang.fortran)?

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19155


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]