This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/14912] Do not print default template arguments in error messages
- From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 26 Mar 2005 19:24:31 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/14912] Do not print default template arguments in error messages
- References: <20040410193158.14912.schnetter@aei.mpg.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-03-26 19:24 -------
OK, before I clean up the patch, I'll post an example. For this code:
----------------------------------------------
#include <map>
#include <vector>
#include <string>
std::map<std::string, std::vector<int> > m;
void bar(void)
{
std::vector<int> k;
m.insert(std::make_pair(0, k));
}
----------------------------------------------
I get this:
<path>/stl_pair.h: In constructor 'std::pair<_T1, _T2>::pair(const
std::pair<_U1, _U2>&) [with _U1 = int, _U2 = std::vector<int>, _T1 = const
std::string, _T2 = std::vector<int>]':
test3.cc:10: instantiated from here
<path>/stl_pair.h:90: error: invalid conversion from 'const int' to 'const
char*'
<path>/stl_pair.h:90: error: initializing argument 1
of 'std::basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>::basic_string(const _CharT*,
const _Alloc&) [with _CharT = char]'
(I manually edited '<path>')
Without my patch, I get this:
<path>/stl_pair.h: In constructor `std::pair<_T1, _T2>::pair(const
std::pair<_U1, _U2>&) [with _U1 = int, _U2 = std::vector<int,
std::allocator<int> >, _T1 = const std::string, _T2 = std::vector<int,
std::allocator<int> >]':
test3.cc:10: instantiated from here
<path>/stl_pair.h:90: error: invalid conversion from `const int' to `const
char*'
<path>/stl_pair.h:90: error: initializing argument 1 of
`std::basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>::basic_string(const _CharT*, const
_Alloc&) [with _CharT = char, _Traits = std::char_traits<char>, _Alloc =
std::allocator<char>]'
If someone wants to submit an additional testcase, I'm happy to test it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14912