[Bug middle-end/18887] [4.0/4.1 Regression] libgcc2.h Improperly determines required built-in function size requirements.

["schlie at comcast dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

------- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net  2005-02-28 22:38 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.0/4.1 Regression] libgcc2.h
 Improperly determines required built-in function size requirements.

> - Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com  2005-02-28 22:10
> We've already gone over this. If you want to modify the sources to
> not declare the long long type for the AVR, fine, but that is on your
> experimental sources.

I agree that this should be closed, as it was originally specific
to the avr;  but please try to understand the difference between
demonstrating a general problem using an existing port as a baseline,
and the stating the port used to demonstrate the general problem has
a bug, which is not what was being claimed. (As I do plan to use the
avr port as a general small target baseline in likely future general
bug reports in this way, as it's the most reliable way to demonstrate
the effect of a single parameter in an otherwise known good port.)





-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18887