This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug ada/19865] [4.0 Regression] ice / gnat bug detected.
- From: "dnovillo at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 14 Feb 2005 22:13:24 -0000
- Subject: [Bug ada/19865] [4.0 Regression] ice / gnat bug detected.
- References: <20050209180751.19865.pluto@pld-linux.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2005-02-14 22:13 -------
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ice / gnat bug detected.
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-14 22:10 -------
> From PR 18706 when I was looking into the bootstrap bug before
>
> "I think this is the same failure as the current bootstrap problem on ppc-darwin.
> For the bootstrap problem we have the following CONST_DECL:
> static struct gnat__strings__string_access C.828 = {.P_ARRAY=(character[(long int)
> <PLACEHOLDER_EXPR struct gnat__strings__string_access>.P_BOUNDS->LB0:(long int)
> <PLACEHOLDER_EXPR struct gnat__strings__string_access>.P_BOUNDS->UB0] *) "",
> .P_BOUNDS=&{.LB0=1, .UB0=0}};
>
> Notice how we take the address of a CONSTRUCTOR this is wrong and we should never do that."
>
That tells me nothing. Show me the failure and the spot where we fail.
You don't seem to be sure of what the problem is.
Diego.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19865