This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug other/18871] Should use -Wextra instead of -W during bootstrap


------- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-02-07 01:02 -------
I see no reason we'd ever want to carry the deprecation of the -W name
through to removing it or making it warn that it is deprecated; synonyms
for warning options don't cause any implementation problems or complexity
in the way the sort of features that are deprecated and then removed do.
Accordingly, I don't see any benefit to adding configure checks and using
a different name for the same option if compiling with newer GCC, rather
than just unconditionally using the older compatible name in bootstrap.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18871


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]