This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/5900] [g77 & gfortran] Lapack regressions since g77 2.95.2
- From: "jvdelisle at verizon dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 1 Feb 2005 07:52:29 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/5900] [g77 & gfortran] Lapack regressions since g77 2.95.2
- References: <20020309112600.5900.schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From jvdelisle at verizon dot net 2005-02-01 07:52 -------
Using -O3 with flag_complex_divide_method = 1 in toplev.c on i686-pc-linux-gnu
CGV drivers: 64 out of 1092 tests failed to pass the threshold
CST drivers: 1 out of 11664 tests failed to pass the threshold
DXV drivers: 200 out of 5000 tests failed to pass the threshold
SXV drivers: 37 out of 5000 tests failed to pass the threshold
SST drivers: 1 out of 14256 tests failed to pass the threshold
ZGV drivers: 66 out of 1092 tests failed to pass the threshold
ZXV drivers: 24 out of 5000 tests failed to pass the threshold
I think this is getting there. I will also start looking at results within for
the outliers.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5900