This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug ada/19489] gnat tools not buildable cross
- From: "joel at oarcorp dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 31 Jan 2005 15:24:02 -0000
- Subject: [Bug ada/19489] gnat tools not buildable cross
- References: <20050117180701.19489.joel@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-01-31 15:23 -------
Subject: Re: gnat tools not buildable cross
neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-29 22:19 -------
>
>>You may try adding a gnattools directory, whose makefile and configury is
>
> based
>
>>on libada's, but which is a host module rather than a target module.
>
>
> Correct (dammit). :-)
>
> I've already done this on the libada-gnattools-branch,
> but I've also done some other things there, which wouldn't be suitable for
> stage 3. Please try a snapshot of the libada-gnattools-branch from... hmm,
> let's see... December 1, 2004.
Where are these snapshots? Or exactly how do you want it checked out
from CVS.
> If it works correctly (and I know it works correctly for native tools),
> it's safe enough to merge to mainline even in stage 3. I would have done so
> already, but without a bug report, it wasn't stage-3-suitable.
There is now a bug report against 4.x and there was at least a lot of
whining for 3.3 and 3.4. :)
> If it doesn't, come back to me; I expect that there's some incremental change
> on top of it which should sort out any remaining problems.
Great. Point me in the right direction and I will be happy to test.
--joel
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19489