This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug rtl-optimization/19464] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] gcse causes poor register allocation


------- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-15 21:48 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] gcse
	causes poor register allocation

On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 21:44 +0000, dberlin at dberlin dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-15 21:44 -------
> Subject: Re:  New: [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression]
> 	gcse causes poor register allocation
> 
> 
> > This is a regression and was introduced by this change:
> 
> I have a very hard time believing this, since the patch below only
> touched store motion.


Unless, of course, GCSE was completely broken for simple expressions
somehow before the patch.





-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19464


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]