This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tree-optimization/15524] [4.0 Regression] jump threading on trees is slow with switch statements with large # of cases


------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-22 19:18 -------
That may all be true, but the fact is that you're now talking about  
missed-optimizations, and not a real compile time hog.  Yes we can 
win.  No, this is not a hog anymore, it's just not as good as it 
could be.  You're also talking about RTL, not tree jump threading. 
 
In fact I think it's plain wrong to keep this bug open.  It's just 
keeping the number of real regressions artificially high.  We have 
compile time slowdowns, and that's a regression.  But we don't need 
to keep bugs open when the issue of that bug was been fixed. 
 
I suggest someone updates the summary and keywords to reflect the 
actual status of the bug, or close this one and open a new one for 
the basically unrelated issues Jeff mentioned 

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|2004-07-27 18:04:40         |2004-12-22 19:18:03
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15524


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]