This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/19072] [4.0 Regression] --disable-static bootstrap failure
- From: "hjl at lucon dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 19 Dec 2004 03:35:20 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/19072] [4.0 Regression] --disable-static bootstrap failure
- References: <20041218213303.19072.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-12-19 03:35 -------
I don't believe libiberty had ever properly supported --disable-static at all.
Basically libiberty just ignored it. A static arhive, which wasn't compiled
with PIC, was built. With my patch, libiberty tries not to build the static
archive, which, of course, isn't supported by libiberty. I will submit a patch
to ignore --disable-static. But I have no idea how --disable-static in
libiberty could have worked on all platforms for binutils.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19072