This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/18897] [4.0 Regression] /usr/ccs/bin/ld: Unsatisfied symbols: putchar (first referenced in build/gengenrtl.o) (data)
- From: "dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 10 Dec 2004 04:38:51 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/18897] [4.0 Regression] /usr/ccs/bin/ld: Unsatisfied symbols: putchar (first referenced in build/gengenrtl.o) (data)
- References: <20041209041325.18897.danglin@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-12-10 04:38 -------
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] /usr/ccs/bin/ld: Unsatisf
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-09
> 04:16 -------
> I think this was caused by:
> 2004-12-08 Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
>
> PR 17982
> * varasm.c (pending_assemble_externals): New static.
> (assemble_external_real): Meat of assemble_external split out
> to this new function.
> (process_pending_assemble_externals): New function.
> (assemble_external): Use gcc_assert. If flag_unit_at_a_time
> is true and the basic test passes, merely cons the decl onto
> the pending list to be handled later.
> * tree.h: Declare process_pending_assemble_externals.
> * cgraphunit.c (cgraph_optimize): Call it.
>
>
> Can you confirm that?
Yes, it introduced the problem.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18897