This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/18641] [4.0 Regression] Another ICE caused by reload of a psuedo reg into f0 for a DImode expr
- From: "uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 5 Dec 2004 15:45:50 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/18641] [4.0 Regression] Another ICE caused by reload of a psuedo reg into f0 for a DImode expr
- References: <20041124011632.18641.fjahanian@apple.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-05 15:45 -------
Basically yes, except that it's not only about CONST_DOUBLE,
but also CONST_INT. Maybe even:
((CONSTANT_P (X) && reg_classes_intersect_p ((CLASS), FLOAT_REGS))
? NO_REGS : ...)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18641