This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/18644] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] -Wsynth warning in <complex>
- From: "bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 30 Nov 2004 17:03:40 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/18644] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] -Wsynth warning in <complex>
- References: <20041124043902.18644.bangerth@dealii.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-30 17:03 -------
Yo thanks G.
Wolfgang, the whole implications of adding copy ctors changing calling
conventions was not clear to me either, before the -Weffc++ changes. There was
some discussion of this at that time, and the libstdc++ ABI document page has a
edited version of the results of that conversation. Turns out adding dtors also
matters.
Anyway.
I'd like to re-assign this to a g++ bug, or middle end or whatever. Sound like a
plan?
-benjamin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18644