This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/18565] gfortran: CONJG: false error message about standard violation
- From: "toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 24 Nov 2004 00:33:41 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/18565] gfortran: CONJG: false error message about standard violation
- References: <20041119130711.18565.anlauf@hep.tu-darmstadt.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl 2004-11-24 00:33 -------
Subject: Re: gfortran: CONJG: false error message about
standard violation
sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2004-11-22 04:19 -------
> Toon,
>
> I take it back. The code as written is correct.
Now you know why I want to have it reviewed :-(
However, your data point is interesting. Perhaps the point where the
decision "is this a Fortran XX intrinsic" is made at the wrong point.
conjg(double complex) obviously is correct Fortran 95 (when double
complex is a "typedef" of COMPLEX(8)), but dconjg is not a correct
specific intrinsic.
Thanks for looking into this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18565