This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tree-optimization/18268] New: missed SRA of a block copy


I think this is a regression from a previous version of 4.0.0

typedef struct
{
  void *ptr1, *ptr2;
  unsigned word;
  unsigned word_bit;
} bitmap_iterator;
void
get_call_expr_operands ()
{
  bitmap_iterator bi;
  bi.ptr1 = 0;
  bi.word = 0;
  bi.word_bit = 0;
start:
  {
    bitmap_iterator bi1 = bi;
    if (bi1.ptr1 != 0)
      goto start;
  }
}

-- 
           Summary: missed SRA of a block copy
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: missed-optimization, diagnostic
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc-*


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18268


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]