This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug ada/17540] New: Duplicate symbols while building Ada
- From: "laurent at guerby dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 17 Sep 2004 21:32:47 -0000
- Subject: [Bug ada/17540] New: Duplicate symbols while building Ada
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
Filed to enable tracking, from "Ada system.fat_lflt.fat_long_float.scaling
problem analysis" discussion on gcc@gcc.gnu.org:
On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 23:24, Richard Kenner wrote:
> s-fatlfl.o(.bss+0x0): In function `system.fat_lflt.fat_long_float.scaling':
>
/home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-20040913T200122/gcc/ada/rts/s-fatgen.adb:540:
multiple definition of `r'
>
s-fatflt.o(.bss+0x0):/home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-20040913T200122/gcc/ada/rts/s-fatgen.adb:540:
first defined here
>
> I'm assuming this is a problem in the Ada front end, though I haven't
> gotten a chance to look at it yet.
I looked at the expanded code for s-fatflt.ads and found the "r":
xa : constant system.system__address :=
system__fat_flt__fat_float__valid__to_addressGP22755__target!
(system__fat_flt__fat_float__valid__float_access(x));
r : system__fat_flt__fat_float__valid__float_rep;
pragma import (ada, r);
for r'address use xa;
freeze r []
The following reduced test case shows the problem:
procedure P is
procedure P1 (X : access Integer) is
R : Integer;
pragma Import (Ada, R);
for R'Address use X.all'Address;
begin
null;
end P1;
procedure P2 (X : access Integer) is
R : Integer;
pragma Import (Ada, R);
for R'Address use X.all'Address;
begin
null;
end P2;
begin
null;
end P;
$ /home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-20040917T192720/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-20040917T192720/gcc/ -c p.adb
/tmp/ccK6lePn.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccK6lePn.s:13: Error: symbol `r' is already defined
My guess is that the r symbol is not flagged as local when
there's an address clause and an Import pragma, so it
might be a gigi problem.
Very similar code is present in GNAT sources and is causing the ACATS
failures, see s-fatgen.adb, function Valid:
XA : constant System.Address := To_Address (Float_Access (X));
R : Float_Rep;
pragma Import (Ada, R);
for R'Address use XA;
-- R is a view of the input floating-point parameter. Note that we
-- must avoid copying the actual bits of this parameter in float
-- form (since it may be a signalling NaN.
Since it's a generic, it might lead to generated code
as I've writen in my example if multiple instanciation
are present. Such a construct has worked for all versions of GNAT, but might depend
on some specific code generation behaviour that is no longer present.
--
Summary: Duplicate symbols while building Ada
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
CC: dewar at gnat dot com,gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17540