This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/16237] [3.5 Regression] ICE caused by Kenner's big untested (regression causing) patch
- From: "pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 28 Jun 2004 00:16:57 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/16237] [3.5 Regression] ICE caused by Kenner's big untested (regression causing) patch
- References: <20040627212339.16237.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2004-06-28 00:16 -------
Subject: Re: [3.5 Regression] ICE caused by Kenner's big untested (regression causing) patch
>
> that will not work as my problem is with ARRAY_REF and not COMPONENT_REF.
>
> The first piece fixes the ARRAY_REF case (the label is outside of
> the range patched) and the second the COMPONENT_REF case.
>
> I now see both dumps in the PR and indeed one has operands 2 and 3 filled in
> and one doesn't. I think I now understand where the one that does comes
> from.
>
> But the patch I just sent assumed that operand_equal_p handled NULL.
> It doesn't. So this is what's needed. It's a kludge, though, but
> it should get you going. I'll try to get the correct patch tomorrow.
But does this not cause a performance regression.
Andrew
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16237