This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/13294] [3.4 Regression] namespace associations vs. specializations
- From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 16 Apr 2004 18:34:33 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/13294] [3.4 Regression] namespace associations vs. specializations
- References: <20031204043712.13294.bkoz@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2004-04-16 18:34 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] namespace associations vs. specializations
bkoz at redhat dot com wrote:
>------- Additional Comments From bkoz at redhat dot com 2004-04-14 04:08 -------
>Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] namespace associations vs.
> specializations
>
>
>
>
>>(It appears to me that this outcome means that standards-conforming programs do
>>not follow the C++ ABI in that specializations of types in "std" are mangled
>>incorrectly. That's observable to user programs by using "typeid". This is
>>presumably a bug in our library implementation, but one that's not easy to fix,
>>and hopefully not terribly important to anybody.)
>>
>>Thank you for persevering with this issue; without having gone this far, we
>>probably would not have known what the issues were.
>>
>>
>
>I'm wondering if we should punt on this stuff for 3.4.0, and revert to STL in namespace std.
>
Do we know how to do that?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13294