This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/14899] [3.5 Regression] wrong code due to change in compatibility rules for vector types
- From: "fjahanian at apple dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 9 Apr 2004 17:20:44 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/14899] [3.5 Regression] wrong code due to change in compatibility rules for vector types
- References: <20040409073632.14899.bonzini@gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From fjahanian at apple dot com 2004-04-09 17:20 -------
Yes, this makes sense now (the bug I mean).
(In reply to comment #3)
> Actually I made the mistake of putting testing the wrong thing.
> Here is the test which should return 0 but does not but did in 3.3.3:
> int f()
> {
> return __builtin_types_compatible_p (__vector unsigned short,
> __vector signed short);
> }
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14899