This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libgcj/14767] gcjlib under FreeBSD does not forward SIGSEGV to SA_SIGINFO handler
- From: "andrew dot gray at anu dot edu dot au" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 8 Apr 2004 00:32:20 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libgcj/14767] gcjlib under FreeBSD does not forward SIGSEGV to SA_SIGINFO handler
- References: <20040329041331.14767.andrew.gray@anu.edu.au>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From andrew dot gray at anu dot edu dot au 2004-04-08 00:31 -------
Hans,
Thanks for your comments, in particular explaining under what
circumstances GC_write_fault_hanlder would be forwarding SIGSEGV.
Regarding your question about the patch:
I have no reason to think FreeBSD needs to be excluded from the #if at
line 124 of os_dep.c (which controls #defining setjmp to be sigsetjmp
and #defining longjmp similarly).
The reason I excluded it in the patch was to restrict the changes to
the signal handling problem. The original code (from the
gcc-3.4-20040310 snapshot, based on gc6.3alpha1) did not define
SUNOS5SIGS for FreeBSD. So the original code did not include the
#define for setjmp and longjmp under FreeBSD. My patch to gcconfig.h
does define SUNOS5SIGS for FreeBSD version 4 or later. So to keep the
behaviour of the original code my patch changes "defined (SUNOS5SIGS)"
to "(defined SUNOS5SIGS) && !defined(FREEBSD)" at line 124.
Sorry, I do not know if a plain setjmp can be used to jump out of a
signal handler on FreeBSD. Also, I do not know if sigsetjmp is
appreciably slower than plain setjmp.
In quickly looking at the code, the most information about whether or
not FreeBSD should use sigsetjmp that I found was your comment in the
README.changes for gc6.3alpha4:
- Made os_dep.c use sigsetjmp and SA_NODEFER for NetBSD. (Thanks to
Christian Limpach.) (I generalized the patch to use sigsetjmp on all
UNIX_LIKE platforms, admittedly a slightly risky move. But it may avoid
similar problems on some other platforms. I also cleaned up the defn
of UNIX_LIKE a bit. - Hans)
Not knowing anything about how the GCC/GCJ people generally manage
syncing the Boehm GC code in GCC with your upstream source, if my
patch was going to be applied to GCC I would be inclined to leave it
as is. That way the change to using sigsetjmp would occur when
gc6.3alpha4 was imported into GCC. What do you think?
Andrew
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14767