This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/14563] octave built under Cygwin very slow


------- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr  2004-04-03 18:24 -------
Subject: Re:  octave built under Cygwin very slow

Sorry, yes, you are right, I can test it but not to see it's effect on 
that gruesome cyming special.

Paul

epanelelytha at kellertimo dot de wrote:

>------- Additional Comments From epanelelytha at kellertimo dot de  2004-04-03 18:00 -------
>(In reply to comment #28)
>  
>
>>Subject: Re:  octave built under Cygwin very slow
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>It's good to know that you are enagaging with this one.  I sent a 
>>message this morning that some how got deleted in the process of being 
>>sent; it's main content was not to forget that the most extreme 
>>manifestation of the difference is with g++ 3.3.1 (cygming special) for 
>>which
>>
>>new/delete takes 1900ns/loop
>>malloc/erase          400ns/loop  
>>
>>This is how we detected this in the first place.
>>
>>For reference, on the same Athlon 1700, 3.2.2 20030222 (RH 3.2.2-5)
>>
>>Gives
>>
>>new/delete              140ns/loop
>>malloc/erase            100ns/loop
>>
>>Unfortunately, I just this morning deleted the g++ 3.3.1 and replaced it 
>>with 3.2 (which does not show such aberrant behaviour, by the way) , so 
>>I cannot test your patch!
>>    
>>
>But you can still test it with 3.2 (I'm using 3.5-tree-ssa 20040403).
>
>  
>




-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14563


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]