[Bug optimization/14749] [3.3 Regression] Miscompilation of bit test

["stevenb at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

------- Additional Comments From stevenb at suse dot de  2004-03-27 01:28 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.3 Regression] Miscompilation of bit test

On Saturday 27 March 2004 02:14, gdr at integrable-solutions dot net wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 
> 2004-03-27 01:14 ------- Subject: Re:  Miscompilation of bit test
>
> "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> | Confirmed, already by me on IRC.
>
> I'm sorry, I can't follow discussions on IRC (e.g. I'm just back from
> office, reading through mails, approving patches, making a status
> report before taking a flight to a conference in Europe in about 12
> hours, and I don't expect to have regular connections there to be on
> IRC).
>
> I would suggest that discussions by GCC developers that affect GCC be
> held on GCC mailing lists.  Or at least, make an archive of those
> discussions (even if that means some people would have tp refrain
> from using some "words").

What discussion? What "words"?

I just pasted the test case into an IRC channel so that Andrew Pinski
could confirm the bug.  I like this kind of direct communication, so
if you don't mind, I'll keep doing things that way and post relevant
information (ie. results from such "discussions") to gcc mailing lists
and/or bugzilla.

I don't ask you to follow IRC, and you should not tell us not to use it.



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14749