This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion


The http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html page says that use of gccbug will cause your
bug report to be mailed to the bug database, but this isn't true since we
switched from GNATS/PRMS to bugzilla.  It just causes it to be mailed to
gcc-bugs where it then likely gets ignored.

Similarly, the BUGS file in release tar balls says the same thing.

gcc/doc/invoke.texi recommends use of gccbug, but should not.

gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi also mentions gccbug, but it seems to be harmless.
Likewise for gcc/doc/configfiles.texi.

Perhaps we should get rid of gccbug?

-- 
           Summary: gccbug confusion
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: other
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]