This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion
- From: "wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 3 Mar 2004 08:43:36 -0000
- Subject: [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
The http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html page says that use of gccbug will cause your
bug report to be mailed to the bug database, but this isn't true since we
switched from GNATS/PRMS to bugzilla. It just causes it to be mailed to
gcc-bugs where it then likely gets ignored.
Similarly, the BUGS file in release tar balls says the same thing.
gcc/doc/invoke.texi recommends use of gccbug, but should not.
gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi also mentions gccbug, but it seems to be harmless.
Likewise for gcc/doc/configfiles.texi.
Perhaps we should get rid of gccbug?
--
Summary: gccbug confusion
Product: gcc
Version: 3.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402