This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/14344] [3.3.3 Regression] MinGW Bootstrap Failure
- From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 29 Feb 2004 22:57:20 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/14344] [3.3.3 Regression] MinGW Bootstrap Failure
- References: <20040229144929.14344.stl@caltech.edu>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-02-29 22:57 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3.3 Regression] MinGW Bootstrap Failure
Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com> writes:
| On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 11:34:40PM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| >| With MinGW, I do take lots of guidance from Danny, however, and he
| >| usually does step in to help with issues like this.
| >
| >OK, would you "sponsor" his being appointed as Cygwin and MinGW
| >maintainer if I make such proposal to the SC?
|
| Danny has repeatedly said that he doesn't want that responsibility.
I don't understand your statement. It comment #14, Danny said:
Gaby wrote:
> Are you interested in maintaining the MinGW port of FSF GCC?
I am interested in maintaining the mingw port, if OK with CGF. I
have been de facto maintainer for awhile now. Most of the patches
I have submitted affect both cygwin and mingw.
| I'm beginning to think this should be in the FAQ or something...
I like FAQs, but in this case I don't know what it would be about, for
you're claiming something which contradicts what Danny just said.
| Probably DJ's name should be removed from MAINTAINERS, though. I
| don't think he's interested in being a cygwin/mingw maintainer.
That is fine with me. Now that you're mentioning that I think the
previous claim I attributed to you where actually DJ's.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14344