This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/14344] [3.3.3 Regression] MinGW Bootstrap Failure
- From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 29 Feb 2004 22:44:16 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/14344] [3.3.3 Regression] MinGW Bootstrap Failure
- References: <20040229144929.14344.stl@caltech.edu>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-02-29 22:44 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3.3 Regression] MinGW Bootstrap Failure
Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com> writes:
| On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 08:23:29PM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| >"stl at caltech dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| >[...]
| >
| >| Joy. That's not even the same error. (It seems to occur later in the build
| >| process, whereas the 3.3.3 error seems to happen early; thus, the error in
| >| 3.3.2 may be present in 3.3.3.) Should I bother with the 3.3.3 prereleases,
| >| and if so, how can I get them from CVS? I know how to get the trunk CVS.
| >
| >Thanks for taking the time to bootstrap previous release. I don't
| >think it is necessary to test the prereleases (unless you have spare
| >cycles ;-)). The immediate conclusion I can draw is that there is no
| >active maintainers for the MinGW port. CGF and DJ are listed as
| >mingw maintainers, but I also recall CFG saying he is no longer
| >maintaining that port. CGF, is that right?
|
| No. I have never said anything like that.
OK, I must have confused with something else. Sorry for the
misrecollection.
| With MinGW, I do take lots of guidance from Danny, however, and he
| usually does step in to help with issues like this.
OK, would you "sponsor" his being appointed as Cygwin and MinGW
maintainer if I make such proposal to the SC?
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14344