This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/14344] [3.3.3 Regression] MinGW Bootstrap Failure
- From: "cgf at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 29 Feb 2004 21:57:15 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/14344] [3.3.3 Regression] MinGW Bootstrap Failure
- References: <20040229144929.14344.stl@caltech.edu>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From cgf at redhat dot com 2004-02-29 21:57 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3.3 Regression] MinGW Bootstrap Failure
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 08:23:29PM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>"stl at caltech dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
>[...]
>
>| Joy. That's not even the same error. (It seems to occur later in the build
>| process, whereas the 3.3.3 error seems to happen early; thus, the error in
>| 3.3.2 may be present in 3.3.3.) Should I bother with the 3.3.3 prereleases,
>| and if so, how can I get them from CVS? I know how to get the trunk CVS.
>
>Thanks for taking the time to bootstrap previous release. I don't
>think it is necessary to test the prereleases (unless you have spare
>cycles ;-)). The immediate conclusion I can draw is that there is no
>active maintainers for the MinGW port. CGF and DJ are listed as
>mingw maintainers, but I also recall CFG saying he is no longer
>maintaining that port. CGF, is that right?
No. I have never said anything like that.
With MinGW, I do take lots of guidance from Danny, however, and he
usually does step in to help with issues like this.
>If noone wants to maintain the MinGW port, I'm afraid I can't help
>you.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14344