This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/11295] [3.4/3.5 regression] ICE in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-lang.c:314 when using a non-trivial object in a compound statement expression
- From: "wilson at specifixinc dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 5 Feb 2004 23:10:52 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/11295] [3.4/3.5 regression] ICE in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-lang.c:314 when using a non-trivial object in a compound statement expression
- References: <20030623155039.11295.jfc@legra.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2004-02-05 23:10 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 regression] ICE in cp_expr_size, at
cp/cp-lang.c:314 when using a non-trivial object in a compound statement
expression
schwab at suse dot de wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-02-03 00:06 -------
> It's ia64 specific. See
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-02/msg00077.html> and
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-02/msg00080.html>.
I don't see any ICEs in the C++ front end. I am seeing ICEs in
force_type_die in dwarf2out.c, which was added 2004-01-27 by Devang
Patel. I see he just checked in a patch which might fix this.
Maybe this got confused with some other IA-64 problem, such as the
CSELIB_PTR_VAL problems?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11295