[Bug optimization/13712] Executable runs 25% slower than when compiled with INTEL compiler

["william dot crocker at analog dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

------- Additional Comments From william dot crocker at analog dot com  2004-01-29 13:10 -------
Subject: Re:  Executable runs 25% slower than when compiled with INTEL compiler


> From dberlin@gcc.gnu.org Thu Jan 22 14:48:06 2004
> Date: 22 Jan 2004 19:48:04 -0000
> From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
> To: william.crocker@analog.com
> Subject: [Bug optimization/13712] Executable runs 25% slower than when compiled with INTEL compiler
> X-Bugzilla-Reason: Reporter
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
> 	tests=none
> 	version=2.60
> X-Spam-Level:  
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp)
> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.38
> 
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2004-01-22 19:48 -------
> That would be a good first step. The testcase doesn't have to be particularly  
> small as a first attempt, but it should be selfcontained. The testcase also  
> doesn't have to do something particularly useful.  
>

I sent in my test case, but the bugzilla data base implies that
you are still "waiting".

Did you get my test case or should I send it again ?

Do you have any email filters which would have rejected
my email ?

Bill
  
> W. 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13712
> 
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
> 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13712