This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug java/13743] New: Debug Info for Java breaks inferior calls
- From: "aph at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 19 Jan 2004 17:16:45 -0000
- Subject: [Bug java/13743] New: Debug Info for Java breaks inferior calls
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
From: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn at redhat.com>
In doing some more testing with java inferior call, I found a key
difference between the java and C++ debug info files that is causing gdb
some grief. We can't make inferior calls to non-static java members as
we can't find the vtable.
In C++, the vtable is being represented by a special member called
_vptr.class. In the DW_AT_structure_type for the class, it has a
special DW_AT_containing_type tag which points to the class that
contains this _vptr member. In this case, Property has the _vptr entry
so it points to itself. Gdb is specifically looking for this _vptr
entry and if it can't find it, gives up trying to resolve a virtual
member function.
In java, the DW_AT_containing_type tag is missing from the
DW_AT_structure_type and there isn't a _vptr member entry. I did find a
vtable member in java.lang.Object but I don't know if that is the same.
It might be possible just to point the containing_type to the
java.lang.Object and then have gdb understand and use the vtable entry.
Any thoughts? We're kind of in unchartered ground here.
I have included a better C++ example for you to look at with the debug
info from readelf -wi. The member function dothat() in the Property
class is comparable from java to C++.
--
Summary: Debug Info for Java breaks inferior calls
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13743