This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug optimization/13526] [3.4 Regression] Assembler error: symbol `.LFB0' is already defined
- From: "dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 30 Dec 2003 22:10:17 -0000
- Subject: [Bug optimization/13526] [3.4 Regression] Assembler error: symbol `.LFB0' is already defined
- References: <20031230210730.13526.danglin@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2003-12-30 22:10 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] Assembler error: symbol
> 2003-12-30 Steven Bosscher <steven@gcc.gnu.org>
>
> Backport from tree-ssa (relevant changes only):
> 2003-12-18 Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
>
> * et-forest.h :....
I currently doing builds to see if Steven's patch is the culprit. If
that's not it, I will try the others.
> 2003-12-29 Roger Sayle <roger@eyesopen.com>
>
> PR fortran/12632
> * fold-const.c (fold) <COND_EXPR>: Don't fold a constant condition,
> if the type of the selected branch doesn't match its' parent.
>
> 2003-12-30 Roger Sayle <roger@eyesopen.com>
>
> * fold-const.c (fold) <COND_EXPR>: Don't require strict type
> equality, instead just prevent replacing a COND_EXPR of non-void
> type by one of its operands of void type.
>
> And that is it.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526