This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/11303] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in stor-layout.c:304 in int_mode_for_mode
- From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 5 Dec 2003 16:59:44 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/11303] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in stor-layout.c:304 in int_mode_for_mode
- References: <20030624053547.11303.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2003-12-05 16:59 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in stor-layout.c:304 in int_mode_for_mode
"bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| Has this been fixed? I don't get any ICE with my mainline snapshot from
| 2003-12-02. Do I have to give some special flags? The only thing I get is
|
| g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.4-pre/bin/c++ x.cc
| x.cc: In instantiation of `int (test<int>::*test<int>::s_callbacks[2])(int)':
| x.cc:13: instantiated from `int test<T>::run(int) [with T = int]'
| x.cc:26: instantiated from here
| x.cc:18: error: argument of type `int (test<int>::)(int)' does not match `int
| (test<int>::*)(int)'
|
| and from the branch:
| g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.3.3-pre/bin/c++ x.cc
| x.cc: In instantiation of `int (test<int>::*test<int>::s_callbacks[2])(int)':
| x.cc:13: instantiated from `int test<T>::run(int) [with T = int]'
| x.cc:26: instantiated from here
| x.cc:18: error: assuming pointer to member `int test<T>::c1(int) [with T =
| int]
| '
| x.cc:18: error: (a pointer to member can only be formed with `&test<T>::c1
| [with T = int]')
The pretty-printing we have in 3.4 is better, but the hint we have in
3.3.x is lost. That worries me.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11303