[Bug bootstrap/12905] 2d level configure script does not recognize gcc/gcc/cp as build dir.

["gnat-dev at buzco dot nyct dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12905



------- Additional Comments From gnat-dev at buzco dot nyct dot net  2003-11-05 09:40 -------
Subject: Re:  2d level configure script does not ...

On 03-11-05 09:02:45, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
| PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12905

| Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-11-05 09:02
| You cannot use the 2nd level configure when configuring gcc.
=== End quoted text ===

I am not, directly. The long mail that I finally sent to the right
address tells (I think) +exactly+ what I am doing and what the results.
It is the outermost config.status (run automatically by configure as
usual) that fails.

Am still trying to back up the changes to find a point where it works.
Am new to CVS (though an old hand at RCS) and having trouble using
+both+ date cutoff and revision tag. Have been trying to do it w/
updates, am going to try it w/ a fresh checkout.

What is the +earliest+ date of the 3.3 branch that is separate from
3.3.2 ?

Will stay with it until I get this resolved. Have you tried a build w/
c++ lately on this branch ?

== Buz :)

--
Buz Cory of BuzCo Systems -- New York NY USA http://BuzCo.nyct.net
<gnat-dev at BuzCo dot nyct dot net> (Buz as GNAT Programmer)
write to <helpdesk at BuzCo dot nyct dot net> for FREE help with:
    Installing/Configuring Linux
    Getting started with the Ada Programming Language dot
Friends don't let friends do DOS; Linux to the rescue!
Ada 95 is here! Why use an archaic, bug-prone language?