This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug java/12759] BInary compatibility: rip out -fno-assume-compiled


PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12759



------- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-10-24 19:09 -------
I wonder if we should instead keep the no-assume-compiled
command-line processing, and reuse it to decide when
to generate more tightly bound code and when to generate
indirect-dispatch code.

The internal "no-assume-compiled ABI" should definitely be
removed.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]