This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/12727] New: mipsisa64-elf -mips32 regression: g++.dg/eh/registers1.C


PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12727

           Summary: mipsisa64-elf -mips32 regression: g++.dg/eh/registers1.C
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.4
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: cgd at broadcom dot com
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: mipsisa64-unknown-elf

In mipsisa64-elf combined tree build with sources as of:
	gcc: -D 2003-10-07 00:00 UTC; src: -D 2003-10-07 00:00 UTC

testing on mips-sim-idt64/-mips32 the g++.dg/eh/registers1.C test passes.

With sources as of:
	gcc: -D 2003-10-22 00:00 UTC; src: -D 2003-10-22 00:00 UTC

it fails.

Looking at the testsuite log, it looks like the test actually failed:

spawn /projects/bbp_ext13/systems/users/cgd/proj/gcc-testing6/work/mipsisa64-elf
.build/sim/mips/run ./registers1.exe 
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/registers1.C execution test

(rather than something "strange" happening).  I recompiled the test and re-ran
it (using the incantations from the test log file), and got the same result.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]