This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug ada/5911] Ada runtime and utilities should be broken out to their own directory
- From: "jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 21 Oct 2003 16:10:02 -0000
- Subject: [Bug ada/5911] Ada runtime and utilities should be broken out to their own directory
- References: <20020310104601.5911.zack@codesourcery.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5911
------- Additional Comments From jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk 2003-10-21 16:09 -------
Subject: Re: Ada runtime and utilities should be broken out
to their own directory
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> For one thing, I started looking at how you add a new e.g. libada directory
> (and enable its configuration and build from the top level directory) and
> I must admit that it is not at all clear how to to that (I'm not a configure
> expert anyway).
>
> Assuming "someone" would add a dummy libada directory
> that would get configured and built (e.g. with an empty Makefile and configure)
> automatically, I could then start working on providing an actual
> configure.in and Makefile.in to make it work for real.
I expect Nathanael can advise on this - and also on anything special
needed in that directory to ensure that such things as multilibs and
Canadian crosses work properly. (Current documentation in this area is
rather lacking, though there's the old etc/configure.texi included in
binutils that documents the *old* toplevel system.)