This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug ada/5911] Ada runtime and utilities should be broken out to their own directory
- From: "charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 21 Oct 2003 12:42:36 -0000
- Subject: [Bug ada/5911] Ada runtime and utilities should be broken out to their own directory
- References: <20020310104601.5911.zack@codesourcery.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5911
------- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-21 12:42 -------
<<
This is not a mere enhancement request, it causes all sorts of build bugs, as
you can see from the dependency list.
>>
Actually this is not quite true: most if not all the PR that have been marked
as dependent on this one can be fixed independently of this issue.
Concerning this specific PR, I believe everyone agrees this would be
a good thing, the main question is how to achieve this.
For one thing, I started looking at how you add a new e.g. libada directory
(and enable its configuration and build from the top level directory) and
I must admit that it is not at all clear how to to that (I'm not a configure
expert anyway).
Assuming "someone" would add a dummy libada directory
that would get configured and built (e.g. with an empty Makefile and configure)
automatically, I could then start working on providing an actual
configure.in and Makefile.in to make it work for real.
Any volunteer ?
Arno