This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug optimization/11637] [3.3/3.4 Regression]g++ invalid assembly with -fnon-call-exceptions
- From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 5 Oct 2003 18:22:48 -0000
- Subject: [Bug optimization/11637] [3.3/3.4 Regression]g++ invalid assembly with -fnon-call-exceptions
- References: <20030722222648.11637.nick@ilm.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11637
------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2003-10-05 18:22 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4 Regression]g++ invalid
assembly with -fnon-call-exceptions
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 23:17, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11637
This patch is OK, with one caveat: I don't understand why it's necessary
to remove REG_NOALIAS notes. If that's not necessary to fix the test
case in question, please omit that one part of the patch. If it is
necessary, go ahead and check in the patch, but please explain what's
going wrong there.
(The docs say that REG_NOALIAS is attached to call instructions, and
here I thought we were always looking a SET.)
Thanks,