This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/11442] [3.3 regression] [arm] invalid assembler on arm


PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11442


rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


------- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-10-01 09:15 -------
Not a bug.  Your source code is invalid.

You can't put any "asm" in your source code that requires more than 4 bytes per
statement.  You have ".skip 16" operations which are violating this constraint
and consequently gcc gets confused in a way which can only be detected by the
assembler.

The compiler does not parse the body of asm statements to divine their meaning.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]