This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug optimization/12419] [3.3/3.4 Regression] Performace regression: poor optimization of const memory
- From: "aph at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 30 Sep 2003 18:23:04 -0000
- Subject: [Bug optimization/12419] [3.3/3.4 Regression] Performace regression: poor optimization of const memory
- References: <20030926105501.12419.aph@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12419
------- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-09-30 18:23 -------
Thanks for the analysis. Yes, this makes sense. But it is a nasty
pessimization, and we need to get it fixed somehow. I'm interested because it
hits method dispatch badly.