[Bug java/12459] New: Checks, schmecks, who needs'em.

["suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12459

           Summary: Checks, schmecks, who needs'em.
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.3.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: java
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org

Unless I'm going completely mad, this is not valid code.

$ cat temp.java

class x
{
    int i;
}
 
class temp
{
 
    int foo()
    {
        return x.i;
    }
}

$ gcj -O2 -S temp.java

$ echo $?
0

I think gcj needs more people using it for real development - it's actually
fairly solid on code that compiles, it's just the typos that confuse it.